It certainly looks like as if in the higher frequencies the fidelity are not present in the YT rips compared to the legit BeatPort MP3. If you compare the 2 YouTube rips, there are some similarity to the way the frequencies peaks in the spectrum analysis. It seems there is something going on with the MediaHuman downloaded version to boost the frequency to 20 kHz. Then loaded them all in spek and took screenshots of each of them.
Interesting, never heard of MediaHuman before.įor a quick test run I just downloaded a track I already bought MP3 from Beatport to compared it to MP3 downloaded from YouTube with MediaHuman and 4K downloader. If you're interested in streaming radio or playing some live sets, check out Reddit's own EMP Radio! Weekly Mix Feedback Thread - /r/beatmatch FAQ Looking to hook up with other DJs in your area? Submit your info here:įor IRC users, check out the following channels on freenode IRC:
If you know of any more that belong over here, please let us know! User Directory You can probably find that track for purchase at one of the following sites: If you play a track live, please support the artist that spent countless hours producing that track.
#Mediahuman video converter shitty quality free
r/Soundsystem has a wiki that goes over how Sound Systems workįeel free to contribute to this list! Related Subreddits TONS of "learning to DJ" related videos!ĭigital DJ Tips posts a review for EVERY controller Omers on taking Gigs outside of your Normal GenresĮllaskins youtube channel. If someone asks you for your page, that's cool, but unsolicited linking will get your post removed.
#Mediahuman video converter shitty quality software
Support the artists who make the music and software you use.Ībsolutely no self-promotion on other people's posts. There are better places for buying/selling gear. If you're posting a mix you MUST post it to the weekly mix thread.
Please only post your mixes to the weekly mix thread!.But again, you really shouldn't be compressing to mp3 in the first place, unless you're one of the few who still has an "mp3 player" that doesn't support AAC. Regardless of how nice the user interface and how easy it is to use, I won't be using or recommending it.įor those who are still compressing to mp3 (which is a really foolish thing to do in this day and age - mp3 was abandoned years ago by the standards bodies in favor of AAC because of mp3's mediocre performance characteristics), MH might be a simple and easy to use option. MH eliminates that AAC advantage altogether by, apparently, imposing its own 20kHz filter on AAC conversions, and I can't condemn that in strong enough words. AAC is a lossy format, but nearly as lossy as mp3. Part of the reason AAC sounds better than mp3 is it has superior audio spectrum. But it was long ago discovered that the original thinking was flawed because it doesn't take into spacial characteristics (sound stage) and high frequency harmonic distortion, etc. For that reason mp3 filters everything above 20kHz. Granted, the human ear can't hear above 20kHz anyway, and that was the original rational used by the standards bodies when they came up with mp3 in 1993 in the first place. If you plot spectrum of the vast majority of iTunes Store purchases you'll find that the spectrum extends to a minimum of 21kHz, and many extend to 22kHz. The conversion with MH yields results which would lead one to believe it's actually using an mp3 codec instead of AAC, with the sharp 20kHz cutoff characteristic of mp3. True to form, XLD yields audio spectrum results that are as close to the original flac as one could hope for (btw, this is only possible if you compress to AAC - mp3 isn't capable of that). For comparison I use Spek, as well as the Plot Spectrum feature in Audacity. I was recently asked my opinion of MediaHuman Audio Converter for compressing flac to AAC/m4a. I've come to depend on it for yielding the best possible audio results. I'm a long-time and regular user of XLD and have come to appreciate its features and versatility.
0 kommentar(er)
